> On May 10, 2015, at 1:35 PM, Phil Sorber <sor...@apache.org> wrote: > > On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 2:24 PM James Peach <jpe...@apache.org> wrote: > >> >>> On Mar 31, 2015, at 11:33 AM, Leif Hedstrom <zw...@apache.org> wrote: >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I’ve updated the tar-ball with the clang-format tools: >>> >>> http://people.apache.org/~zwoop/clang-format-03312015.tar.bz2 >>> >>> >>> The MD5 of the tar-ball is >>> >>> minotaur (18:28) 266/0 $ md5 clang-format-03312015.tar.bz2 >>> MD5 (clang-format-03312015.tar.bz2) = >> 6b3e7933f3e93b52361c88970bc0d8fe >>> >>> >>> Please use this exact version of clang format. Currently, it has a >> static binary for Linux, which I hope should work on most platforms (let me >> know if it doesn’t). In addition, it also has a binary for OS X (Yosemite, >> I have not tested on Maverick). It’s important we all use the same version, >> so going forward, I’m versioning the packages as well, with the date. If >> you are developing on a platform other then Linux and OS X, let me know and >> I’ll try to make a version for that as well. >>> >>> Question: Should we consider incorporating these binaries and scripts >> into our source tree? >> >> Yes, definitely! >> > > I am -1 on binaries in the repo, but if we wanted to put the code and build > it, I'd be ok with that. I assume the license is compatible?
Maybe a submodule? or a script that downloads and stashes the right binaries in the right place? J
