we are still work on the ATS, hehe. Weijin and me are working on our new startup, just lack of time to support codes changed recently, you guys made so many changes :D
will take a look at this issue. > 在 2015年2月5日，下午10:59，Alan M. Carroll <a...@apache.org> 写道： > > Tuesday, February 3, 2015, 2:45:03 PM, you wrote: > >> Hello, > >> We've being performing some cache tests and noticed two issues that we >> would like to check with the community: > >> 1. The interim cache is limited to the same size as the RAM cache, no >> matter how big the partition allocated to it is. > > Unfortunately the developers of the interim cache don't really work on > Traffic Server anymore and I'm not sure anyone left understands how it works. > >> 2. Whenever a volume gets full and the write head begins writing to the >> volume's start again, the RAM cache gets unused for a while, and requests >> that could be served from RAM get served from the storage. > > That seems very odd. There shouldn't be any interaction between stripe wraps > and use of the ram cache, especially since the ram cache is filled from reads > which should be happening from all parts of the stripe. When you say it is > unused, is this for objects just written, or do no objects seem to end up in > the ram cache? > - Yongming Zhao 赵永明
