> On Jan 27, 2015, at 8:56 AM, Phil Sorber <sor...@apache.org> wrote: > > On Tue Jan 27 2015 at 9:18:49 AM James Peach <jpe...@apache.org> wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I'd like to establish a consistent policy for build dependencies. >> Currently, we have a number of required dependencies that the build >> platform is expected to provide, some more that we bundle but are not (yet) >> required, and some that are strictly optional. >> >> Required platform dependencies: >> - openssl >> - pcre >> - tcl >> - xml2 or expat >> >> Bundled (not required) dependencies: >> - libck >> - lua >> >> I propose that there's no real distinction between these two sets, so we >> should unbundle the bundled dependencies. If we want to persist with >> bundled dependencies, then I think we need a new methodology for deciding >> which dependencies should be bundled, and a better mechanism for actually >> bundling them. >> >> > The reason for bundling those two was that there wasn't ubiquitous platform > support for them. We could not rely on a good version on every platform we > currently support. And at least for libck, the intent was to eventually > unbundle it as we were able to deprecate the platforms that did not support > it.
So following this reasoning we should also bundle spdylay? J
