> On Jan 5, 2015, at 10:20 AM, Leif Hedstrom <zw...@apache.org> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> On Jan 5, 2015, at 11:17 AM, James Peach <jpe...@apache.org> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>>> On Jan 5, 2015, at 4:05 AM, Nick Kew <n...@apache.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>> On Mon, 2015-01-05 at 08:44 +0700, Neddy, NH. Nam wrote:
>>>> I can't build RC3 on Debian Whezzy x64.
>>>> 
>>>> ./configure --prefix=/opt/ats520 --enable-static-proxy
>>>> --enable-experimental-plugins --enable-test-tools --with-user=proxy
>>>> --with-ncurses --with-openssl=/usr
>>> 
>>> I can reproduce exactly that on wheezy.  The culprit is the
>>> --enable-static-proxy, without which it builds just fine.
>>> What's the history of that option?  I've never used it,
>>> and it appears not to exist in 4.x.
>> 
>> Apparantly in the past, people built the traffic_server binary static for 
>> performance reasons (the --enable-static-libts build option). I introduced 
>> this build option to preserve the original use case, but to play better with 
>> automake linking options. I'll try to fix this …
> 
> 
> Cool, thanks James. Please file a Jira for this unless there already is one. 
> I’m not going to stop the release process for v5.2.0 for this, but we can 
> consider a backport for v5.2.1 if there is a need / wish for it.
> 
> Fwiw, the performance reasons, afaik, was for 32-bit platforms, where the 
> static linking could save a register. I don’t know that we care much for that 
> any more, right?

I'm happy to nuke it or to commit a patch that nukes it

J

Reply via email to