We've been calculating Ram cache hit rate as
proxy.process.cache.ram_cache.hits / proxy.process.cache.ram_cache.misses

However, we've sometimes seen the disk cache hit rate
trafficserver_proxy.process.http.cache_hit_.* /
trafficserver_proxy.process.http.cache_(hit|miss)_.*
to be lower than the RAM cache hit rate -- which shouldn't be able to happen.

At the 2014 Sunnyvale Summit, AMC indicated that
proxy.process.cache.ram_cache.misses does not measure what it's label
implies (but I what it actually measures is slightly beyond my grasp.

Is this the proper way to get RAM cache hit rate?
proxy.process.cache.ram_cache.hits /
trafficserver_proxy.process.cache.ram_cache.hits,trafficserver_proxy.process.http.cache_(hit|miss)_.*

thanks,
miles

Reply via email to