Hi, On 08.07.2014 16:44, Jean Baptiste Favre wrote: > I run Trafficserver on Wheezy. For that I needed to backport it. > I didn't saw Trafficserver 5.0 hit sid. I'll have a look.
Yes, that's right. That being said note that official backports are called that way because they are using the original Debian Testing packages and re-compiled to meet Wheezy's dependencies. Backports are not made from scratch. :-) > About contribution, I'm still learning packaging and did not want to > bother you with stupid question. I'm currently working with a Debian Dev > to be able to provide some little packages and contribute efficiently to > Debian. We (Debian folks) don't mind questions. That's the way it's done in Debian. You start contributing and someone else is mentoring you to get into it. Feel free to pop-up on #debian-mentors on OFTC for Debian packaging questions, or ask people on mailing lists. Most of us don't mind to help beginner. > I can assure you I did not meant to offend anyone, nor keeping my work > on my side only. I'm not offended at all or meant to address you personally. I just find this "fork-and-patch" mentality github kids today seem to prefer a bit strange. After all, we're all having the same goal, just join our all efforts which saves our all spare time we're putting into this. > Maybe we should continue this conversation in private without disturbing > ATS dev mailing ? If you prefer, sure. You do also find me on both IRC channels mentioned above. -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
