Friday, August 9, 2013, 3:01:04 PM, you wrote: > should we generalize ts:cv to extend it to other configs?
That's one of the things I was planning on at some point. Having a domain means we can store all sorts of useful data for this kind of thing and do fancy stuff with it (e.g., letting you type the minimal trailing unique name for a config var). I'm not sure what I would do first - a 'ts:stat' might be nice. We have a config file wrapper type already, we may want to pull that in. For most of the other configs, though, I'm not sure it makes sense. The number of cases is small and probably not worth the hassle. If I have time, the next thing I am going to write is a C domain extension for enums. That would be very useful right now. Then a C domain 'constant'. I also want to do a github thing, so you can point to source files on github. And, we should look at the already written Doxy-Link extension. So, yeah - I'm sure no one will mind if I stop hacking on TS and switch to full time doc support.
