On 5/1/13 8:33 AM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
On 5/1/13 1:53 AM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
On 05/01/2013 02:49 AM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
On 4/30/13 6:13 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
ing what the users of ATS have to say about this.
Indeed. Debian (and its users) for example will get ATS 3.0 when
the new
stable version will be released presumably this week with its own
3 year
cycle to start right then.
All excellent points.
Ok, so I'll take this feedback, and start a Wiki page tomorrow. I'm
attaching an image of what the release roadmap could look like (early
draft). Also, even though we've said we wanted 6 months release
cycles, it's actually never happened. So going forward, lets be
realistic and aim for 1 major release per year :).
I guess not, we can't send attachment for some unknown reasons :-/.
See http://people.apache.org/~zwoop/ats/ATS%20Release%20Roadmap.pdf
-- Leif
You do like them pdf files, don't you ;)
Ok, I uploaded a new version, in TIFF, PNG and EPS just for you.
http://people.apache.org/~zwoop/ats/ATS%20Release%20Roadmap.png
http://people.apache.org/~zwoop/ats/ATS%20Release%20Roadmap.eps
http://people.apache.org/~zwoop/ats/ATS%20Release%20Roadmap.tiff
I wasn't going into explaining things here (I'll do it on the wiki), but
as you can tell, I figure we give a 1 year sunset for our older
releases, since we did not make an official committement before. For new
releases, we do a 2year LTS + 6 months Sunset (pretty aggressive, but
things move fast here :).
Cheers,
-- Leif
