On 2/5/13 9:00 AM, James Peach wrote:
On Feb 5, 2013, at 5:41 AM, Leif Hedstrom <zw...@apache.org> wrote:
b) would be my preference.
Mine too ;)
I think the move towards --enable-experimental-plugins on the buildbots might
give you exactly that: People owning up to (their?) code, fixing broken builds
or at the very least filing tickets.
Except the buildbots would be broken indefinitely unless you do option d). You
simply won't get several if these plugins to compile and run without very
significant amount of work. Or lots of ifdef's :)
I think that most of the plugins that need that kind of work are not even built
when the option is enabled ...
Ah, so we already have d) in place then. There ought to be some (simple)
ways for someone who wants to fix these broken plugins to build them as
well, no?
-- Leif
