On 29/01/2013, at 7:43 AM, Valerie Thompson <vthomp...@ena.com> wrote:

> I am doing a 3.0.x plugin using C. Similar to the documentation hosted here:
> http://trafficserver.apache.org/docs/trunk/sdk/plugin-management/guide-to-the-logging-api.en.html
> 
> I have gotten everything to compile, and my plugin works at a basic level but 
> I want to get logging going so I can get information about next steps.
> 
> When I put in all the pieces described above no log was created in my log 
> directory.

Were you running traffic_server by hand or under traffic_manager? I'm pretty 
sure you need traffic_manager for logging.

>  
> Here is my config file snippet:
> 
> 
> ##############################################################################
>    # possible values for logging_enabled:
>    #   0: no logging at all
>    #   1: log errors only
>    #   2: log transactions only
>    #   3: full logging (errors + transactions)
> CONFIG proxy.config.log.logging_enabled INT 3
> CONFIG proxy.config.log.max_secs_per_buffer INT 5
> CONFIG proxy.config.log.max_space_mb_for_logs INT 25000
> CONFIG proxy.config.log.max_space_mb_for_orphan_logs INT 25
> CONFIG proxy.config.log.max_space_mb_headroom INT 1000
> CONFIG proxy.config.log.hostname STRING localhost
> CONFIG proxy.config.log.logfile_dir STRING /var/log/trafficserver
> CONFIG proxy.config.log.logfile_perm STRING rw-r--r--
> CONFIG proxy.config.log.custom_logs_enabled INT 1
> CONFIG proxy.config.log.squid_log_enabled INT 1
> CONFIG proxy.config.log.squid_log_is_ascii INT 0
> 
> I'm guessing this could be configuration or permissions but any clue on where 
> to start to debug this? Or what to look for?
> 
> Permissions on logging dir:
> [root@man01 trafficserver]# ls -la /var/log/trafficserver/
> total 32
> drwxr-xr-x   2 ats  ats   4096 Jan 24 14:51 .
> drwxr-xr-x. 19 root root  4096 Jan 29 03:31 ..
> -rw-r--r--   1 ats  ats    522 Jan 28 22:52 diags.log
> -rw-r--r--   1 ats  ats    540 Jan 28 22:52 manager.log
> -rw-r-----   1 root root 12897 Jan 28 22:52 traffic.out
> 
> Sincerely,
> Valerie

Reply via email to