This is not a bug. But I find there is no way to turn off the debug string
in Via header.

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-973?focusedCommentId=13285471&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-13285471

On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 12:58 PM, Leif Hedstrom <zw...@apache.org> wrote:

> On 5/29/12 9:34 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
>
>> On 5/29/12 6:13 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
>>
>>> On 5/28/12 2:54 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> I've prepared a release for v3.1.4. This has a large number of fixes
>>>> and new features over 3.1.3. Unless there are serious stability problems
>>>> with this release, it will also become our next stable release (v3.2). So
>>>> we urge and encourage everyone to give this final development release a
>>>> good test run. Cast your +- votes as soon as possible, particularly if
>>>> there are serious problems.
>>>>
>>>> The artifacts are available at http://people.apache.org/~**
>>>> zwoop/rel-candidates/ <http://people.apache.org/~zwoop/rel-candidates/>
>>>> :
>>>>
>>>
>>> New artifacts fixing TS-1277 and TS-1279 are now available on the same
>>> URL above:
>>>
>>>
>>>  Well, there's more problems now with the fixes related to TS-1277 :/.
>> We'll respin again tomorrow.
>>
>
> Alright, one more try... Same location as above, I've also extended the
> votes until Friday. Sorry for the inconvenience, but please keep testing /
> finding bugs :).
>
> -rw-r--r--  1 zwoop  zwoop  2515420 May 30 04:55
> trafficserver-3.1.4-unstable.**tar.bz2
> -rw-r--r--  1 zwoop  zwoop      836 May 30 04:55
> trafficserver-3.1.4-unstable.**tar.bz2.asc
> -rw-r--r--  1 zwoop  zwoop       71 May 30 04:55
> trafficserver-3.1.4-unstable.**tar.bz2.md5
> -rw-r--r--  1 zwoop  zwoop       79 May 30 04:55
> trafficserver-3.1.4-unstable.**tar.bz2.sha1
>
> minotaur (04:56) 262/0 $ cat *.[ms]*
> 7b4f788c1b1c5cf753c5530512d8e5**71 *trafficserver-3.1.4-unstable.**tar.bz2
> aa250da8247facc344bf7735876859**902e369d41 *trafficserver-3.1.4-unstable.*
> *tar.bz2
>
>
> -- Leif
>
>

Reply via email to