+1 from me.
On Thu, 2012-04-26 at 08:28 -0700, James Peach wrote:
> On Apr 26, 2012, at 7:36 AM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > James suggested a while ago that we change how we deal with backported
> > bugs. I agree with him that our system of closing, reopening, reassigning
> > etc. is not only complicated, but difficult to follow.
> >
> > His suggestion was simply to clone a bug that has been approved for
> > backport, and mark that for the backport version. Jira supports this I'm
> > fairly certain. This would make the original bug kept closed after
> > committed to trunk, and the cloned bug is used exclusive for the
> > backport(s).
> >
> > The one objection I've heard is that this could duplicate the number of
> > bugs that we have, but the per release statistics would not change in any
> > way.
> >
> > What do you guys think? I'm personally +1 on this idea.
>
> +1 from me ... I find it quite confusing when fixe bugs get re-opened for
> backports
>
> J
