This looks to be superior to that patch, so I would be for replacing that. I still see this as a quite complicated bandaid, but if it makes things better in the short term, I am not opposed.
john On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 11:44 AM, Alan M. Carroll < a...@network-geographics.com> wrote: > One thing that should be noted is that, regardless of whether this patch > is a permanent fix, I think it is clearly superior to the current > rescheduling patch which would be removed. > >
