-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hello,

On 23.09.2011 17:52, Igor Galić wrote:
> in a long time to do so now. Please cast your votes or concerns
> for the remaining.

First, 3.0.x as of right now builds fine on my Debian box. However I
noticed a non critical issue. Regressions checks don't compile on gcc
4.6 (once again) in combination with -Werror which is used in default
builds:

test_atomic.cc: In function ‘int main(int, const char**)’:
test_atomic.cc:214:7: error: cast to pointer from integer of different
size [-Werror=int-to-pointer-cast]
cc1plus: all warnings being treated as errors

This does not occur in trunk, as Igor consolidated string functions
there, which, "by accident" also fixed that compile time issue. Probably
its not desirable to backport the full set of invasive changes to 3.0.x
though.

Also I will probably patch my Debian build with my patch proposed in
TS-967 due to a compile time build flags transition in Debian which
passes several CFLAGS now, including but not limited to hardening flags.
I am, however, perfectly fine if that fix is not (yet?) backported to a
3.0.x stable release.


Finally I was informed by an user in #trafficserver that parent caching
is broken in 3.0, but working in 3.1. I see several related patches in
trunk which could have caused that that fix - but I am not exactly in
the position to judge here. Presuming there is a real issue with parent
caching (I can't test right now) that should definitively be backported.


- -- 
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
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=wXFk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to