I would like to suggest removing DynArray and replacing it where appropriate 
with std::vector. This would IMHO have the advantages of using a standard 
container which, frankly, is likely superior in performance, with a better API, 
much better documentation, lower maintenance, and more familiar to incoming 
developers.

I am not suggesting a general use of STL containers, only specifically 
std::vector, which IMHO has few to none of the issues that are brought up with 
regard to other STL containers. I would be willing to take point on doing the 
replacement.

Reply via email to