Great, sounds good. I just wanted to make sure we don't do anything that would risk losing our CoAdvisor privileges, since it is a very useful tool.
Sent from my iPad On Nov 8, 2010, at 3:11 AM, Nick Kew <n...@apache.org> wrote: > > On 8 Nov 2010, at 01:29, Leif Hedstrom wrote: > >> On 11/07/2010 06:21 PM, Nick Kew wrote: >>> A while back I put httpd's mod_proxy through the coadvisor test suite[1] >>> and fixed a >>> bunch of protocol violations, most of them pedantic edge-cases. >>> >>> I've just put trafficserver's forward proxy through the same suite. >>> First-pass results >>> are at http://people.apache.org/~niq/coadvisor/trafficserver-2.1.3.html >>> Out of 368 testcases, it shows 302 successful passes, 43 protocol >>> violations, >>> and 24 test cases which failed to complete. My comments apply to httpd, >>> and >>> should be ignored for trafficserver, except where they apply to the >>> testcases. >> >> Cool. I started filing a few bugs before, and fixed a few too, from the same >> Coadvisor reports. I was told by Alex not to publish full reports, so I >> think we should just discuss / file bugs from the reports as appropriate. > > It's not a full report, just test results, with links back to the test case > descriptions. > I recollect discussing these kind of things with Alex back in 2007 when I > first > hacked up the scripts for producing these summaries from the full reports. > It's all about him wanting a single point of contact rather than potentially > having a whole bunch of apache developers firing questions and comments > at him (or so I understand). > > I'll ping you on IRC later. > > -- > Nick Kew
