Hey Sorry to butt in but why do you not just use Plone 4 ? massively fast, and it can do pretty much anything you need, it has many built in functions and a great document centre + the possibility to export in many formats and is multi-lingual with a straight forward side by side translation system called Lingua Plone. ' Peace
Wyn Williams PS I will happily give it space on one of Devaus's clusters for free, ATS is well worth it On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 17:36 -0600, Leif Hedstrom wrote: > On 10/25/2010 10:41 AM, Miles Libbey wrote: > > > > ie, Docbook? (Shutters) It is the 'industry standard', but, it would imply > > that we'll have some transformation scripts to produce both the > > I don't know, the experts in the community should decide / work on this :). > > > HTML and PDFs. Docbook is just XML, so, its more strict than HTML, but > > there are not many free docbook tools and IMHO don't hide the complexity > > very well. Regardless, I'm not opposed to tossing the current > > documentation setup, but, I think we need to be quite clear on the problems > > we are trying to solve, and make sure the new stuff will really solve them. > > > > One problem we'll eventually need to solve is how to do translations. No > > matter what code the documentation is written in, I don't think that's > > going to be easily done. > > I totally forgot about that. Yes, this is absolutely a requirement going > forward with any 'rewrite' of the docs system. I know some people have > already completed a chinese version of the docs, yet we have no way of > "incorporating" this easily at least. Not to mention how to deal with > incremental updates to the docs (how will a translation owner know that > a particular piece in the english document has changed?). > > Cheers, > > -- Leif >
