But doesn't that apply just as well to C++, or even C? Saturday, July 24, 2010, 8:06:01 PM, you wrote:
> It seems like the only thing "S" about "STL" is the specification, not > in implementation
But doesn't that apply just as well to C++, or even C? Saturday, July 24, 2010, 8:06:01 PM, you wrote:
> It seems like the only thing "S" about "STL" is the specification, not > in implementation