[+1] CTR for trunk, RTC for all release branches.
On 3/1/2010 8:52 PM, Paul Querna wrote: > On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 7:44 PM, Leif Hedstrom <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi everyone, >> >> up for vote is to decide on a policy for RTC ("Review-Then-Commit") vs CTR >> ("Commit-Then-Review). Attached below are four options, ranging from the >> most conservative to the most liberal. Please vote on this, I urge everyone >> working with the source to vote within 72 hours. If you are only going to >> vote on one thing, vote on this one. :) >> >> Vote on the following alternatives >> ----------------------------------- >> >> [ ] RTC for everything except trivial changes (e.g. comments). >> >> [ ] RTC for everything, except very small changes which are CTR. >> >> [ ] RTC for everything, except code which would take ~5 minutes to review. >> Such changes are CTR. >> >> [+1] CTR for trunk, RTC for all release branches. > > CTR for trunk, RTC for stable/release branches makes the most sense > for most server projects, and enables committers to easily do work in > trunk without burdensome process.
