Ditto. Can any C++ zealots please stand up? ;-) -----Original Message----- From: Leif Hedstrom [mailto:zw...@apache.org] Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2009 3:53 PM To: trafficserver-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: C++ version of InkAPI ?
On 11/25/2009 04:32 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote: > > > I'd suggest we come up with a list of the requirements for what needs > to be done in the "2.x" branch, and then freeze it. I'd be hard to > convince that addressing the issues listed above is not one of those > requirements :). I should say, changing APIs to be C++ is definitely not on my personal "requirements" list, but I'm open to the ideas. You know me, I'm not much of a C++ "biggot" in any way (me and templates don't go well together). If we decide that changing APIs to C++ can wait until a (much) later 3.0 release, than I'm totally fine with that (or, even canning the idea of C++ APIs as well, I just don't really feel strongly either way). There might be bigger fishes to fry honestly, like you say, getting a stable release is definitely one of them (but, I still think we need to examine the existing APIs, and fix that which is missing or outright broken). Cheers, -- leif Protected by Websense Hosted Email Security -- www.websense.com
