On 11/12/09 9:51 AM, Leif Hedstrom wrote: > Something to consider... I can see both sides of RTC vs CTR. Thoughts?
This is where a good DVCS helps: developers happily work in their own branches, committing as they go. Then, after review, the changes can get merged into the main-line trunk/HEAD. In projects where reliability and stability are valued over feature count, RTC is the way to go. In projects where rapid development and addition of features are valued over short-term reliability and stability, CTR is preferred. IMHO, of course. -- Dossy Shiobara | do...@panoptic.com | http://dossy.org/ Panoptic Computer Network | http://panoptic.com/ "He realized the fastest way to change is to laugh at your own folly -- then you can let go and quickly move on." (p. 70)
