Sounds good to me. On Wed, Aug 26, 2026, 9:23 AM Tim Allison <[email protected]> wrote:
> This, from Eric, is my mental model of 4.x vs 3.x stated plainly. Dev > focus will be on 4, with as little as possible backported. I'm worried > about _our_dependencies... we'll still have to upgrade those to the > degree they continue to support jdk11. > > It feels like we've hit consensus for 18 months to EOL for 3.x. ... > let's say Feb 29, 2028? > > I'll send an announcement to user@ and dev@ with this decision and the > general update plan for 3.x? > > WDYT? > > ---------- Forwarded message --------- > From: Eric Pugh <[email protected]> > Date: Wed, Aug 26, 2026 at 9:22 AM > Subject: "Tip/Tail" dev model > To: <[email protected]> > > > I wanted to share this JEP that was shared with me > https://openjdk.org/jeps/14 that I think is interesting approach! > > I’m curious if LTS idea evolves into “We support these LTS versions of > Java”…. > > Disclaimer > > The information contained in this communication from the sender is > confidential. It is intended solely for use by the recipient and > others authorized to receive it. If you are not the recipient, you are > hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking > action in relation of the contents of this information is strictly > prohibited and may be unlawful. > > This email has been scanned for viruses and malware, and may have been > automatically archived by Mimecast, a leader in email security and > cyber resilience. Mimecast integrates email defenses with brand > protection, security awareness training, web security, compliance and > other essential capabilities. Mimecast helps protect large and small > organizations from malicious activity, human error and technology > failure; and to lead the movement toward building a more resilient > world. To find out more, visit our website. >
