[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-4400?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17950139#comment-17950139
 ] 

Hudson commented on TIKA-4400:
------------------------------

SUCCESS: Integrated in Jenkins build Tika ยป tika-main-jdk17 #712 (See 
[https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Tika/job/tika-main-jdk17/712/])
TIKA-4400 -- move some modules to the sandbox profile (#2183) (github: 
[https://github.com/apache/tika/commit/142672e295ed7c50e551d1c67461fdf213ee5321])
* (edit) tika-parsers/tika-parsers-ml/pom.xml


> Consider simplifying the build with a sandbox profile
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TIKA-4400
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-4400
>             Project: Tika
>          Issue Type: Task
>            Reporter: Tim Allison
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 4.0.0
>
>
> All, there are a couple of modules that are not really supported any more. We 
> could literally move the modules to a tika-sandbox module  which is 
> optionally built, or, more simply, add them to a {{sandbox}} profile.
> Users could then continue to use and build those modules with -Psandbox or 
> similar. 
> My proposal only affects {{main}}.
> WDYT?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to