[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-4294?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17871127#comment-17871127
]
Tilman Hausherr commented on TIKA-4294:
---------------------------------------
that alternative is still there:
{code}
Class superClazz = className.equals(superClassName) ? clazz :
Class.forName(superClassName);
{code}
The result will always be the {{superClassName}} class. It only makes sense if
you'd assume that {{Class.forName}} is a very slow operation (I don't know if
it is), or could fail for security reasons. Or I'm missing something here.
> Simplify serialization/deserialization of ParseContext
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: TIKA-4294
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-4294
> Project: Tika
> Issue Type: Task
> Reporter: Tim Allison
> Priority: Trivial
> Fix For: 3.0.0
>
>
> Via [~dimirsen] (?) and [~tilman]'s ping on TIKA-4252, we should simplify the
> serialization and deserialization of ParseContext to avoid redundancy of the
> superclass.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
