Makes sense. Thank you! We also need to run the regression tests against 2.x to see if there are any surprises.
On Fri, Jul 12, 2024 at 1:13 PM Tilman Hausherr <thaush...@t-online.de> wrote: > > +1 > > built on windows 10 jdk11 > > Before releasing the real 3.0.0 we need to remove any "-M" dependencies > (I've added these so we support these other projects by testing them), > and decide about the ffmpeg issue and the hdf5 issue. > > Tilman > > On 12.07.2024 18:08, Tim Allison wrote: > > A candidate for the Tika 3.0.0-BETA2 release is available at: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tika/3.0.0-BETA2 > > > > The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in: > > https://github.com/apache/tika/tree/3.0.0-BETA2-rc1/ > > > > The SHA-512 checksum of the archive is > > 8a4142f61110f196c550146637994d26f66d6c798fc9e1d18dcadcb8a8fe817a52f59f3a03341809131f59b644fa2e183212bdee5f292d3d603d1a5a893c6848. > > > > In addition, a staged maven repository is available here: > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetika-1105/org/apache/tika > > > > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Tika 3.0.0-BETA2. > > The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at > > least three +1 Tika PMC votes are cast. > > > > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Tika 3.0.0-BETA2 > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because... > > > > Here's my +1. > > > > Thank you, all! > > > > Best, > > > > Tim > >
