[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-741?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15137110#comment-15137110
 ] 

Tim Allison edited comment on TIKA-741 at 2/8/16 3:55 PM:
----------------------------------------------------------

I'd recommend adding the following to your EnhancedPDF2XHTML:

{noformat}
    @Override
    protected void writeParagraphStart() throws IOException {
+        super.writeParagraphStart();
{noformat}

and
{noformat}
    @Override
    protected void writeParagraphEnd() throws IOException {
+        super.writeParagraphEnd();
{noformat} 

Finally, if your modifications of our PDFParsers are enhancements that have 
general applicability, please, oh, please share them with us.


was (Author: talli...@mitre.org):
I'd recommend adding the following to your EnhancedPDF2XHTML:

{{noformat}}
    @Override
    protected void writeParagraphStart() throws IOException {
+        super.writeParagraphStart();
{{noformat}}

and
{{noformat}}
    @Override
    protected void writeParagraphEnd() throws IOException {
+        super.writeParagraphEnd();
{{noformat}} 

Finally, if your modifications of our PDFParsers are enhancements that have 
general applicability, please, oh, please share them with us.

> "Zip bomb" (XML nesting) detection is too strict
> ------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TIKA-741
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-741
>             Project: Tika
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: parser
>    Affects Versions: 0.10
>            Reporter: Erik Hetzner
>            Assignee: Jukka Zitting
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 1.0
>
>
> I get "zip bomb" errors from many HTML documents, e.g. 
> http://www.akhbaar.org/wesima_articles/index-20100101-82736.html
> Is there a way that the element nesting level could be made configurable? 30 
> elements just doesn't seem to be enough.
> Thanks!



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to