Hi Ray, I'd say what you proposed is fine by me. Doesn't seem to have generated objections so please move forward.
Cheers, Chris On Jul 1, 2012, at 4:56 PM, Ray Gauss II wrote: > Is there any consensus on TIKA-930 [1]? I don't want to wipe out properties > that others feel are critical or include non-ratified standards if that's > outside of policy. > > If there's no objection to what's outlined in that issue I can commit those > changes tomorrow morning (GMT -4). > > Regards, > > Ray > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-930 > > > On Jul 1, 2012, at 7:22 PM, Nick Burch wrote: > >> On Sun, 1 Jul 2012, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote: >>>> It can be a big pain if an in-progress API is suddenly effectively frozen >>>> by the need to be compatible into the future... >>> >>> Agreed -- so, what do you think? How much longer do we need to wrap up the >>> API changes or whatever going on with the metadata stuff? A week? 2 weeks? >> >> Dunno, all my bits are in.... >> >> Ray? Jörg? Are there any outstanding bits left? Anything you need more >> feedback/review on, before Chris does the release? >> >> Nick > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. Senior Computer Scientist NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246 Email: chris.a.mattm...@nasa.gov WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
