On 23/08/18 02:18, David Demelier wrote:
> On Mon, 2023-07-24 at 17:38 +0200, Sagar Acharya wrote:
> > I see C compilers recommended by suckless are:
> > 
> > tinycc
> > simplecc
> > cproc
> > qbe
> > lacc
> 
> qbe isn't a compiler. however cproc is promising but I had various
> issues compiling some apps, can't use it as my daily for now.

I haven't checked recently, but the most noticeable missing feature of cproc, 
as well as some other compilers, were VLAs. When someone writes the support for 
VLAs, cproc & co. will become much more usable.

The simpler compilers generally work for smaller projects, but for many 
existing packages, for now there is no real alternative to GCC and Clang/LLVM.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to