I feel the same way. Even the scrollback patched into St doesn't seem right (unless there's some other patch, I don't remember). Tmux fixes that, and.. well.. I prefer using Tmux, and it's pre-installed on OpenBSD, so what the hell?
multiple cut-n-paste buffers? Could be one of more important things I discovered this month! Have some Unix! > *** s...@plunder.tech [2023-07-04 19:37]: > >I use ST without any patching, and have done so for years. It is very fast and > >works flawlessly in my experience. All the other terminals have serious issues. > > Agreed! I use st for more than 10 years already and completely do not > understand what are people missing from it, except for useless things > that must not be in it (like scrollback support). No noticeable or any > seriously impacting issues I can remember so far. It does everything is > should. I run it with tmux running inside for scrollback, history > searching, multiple cut-n-paste buffers and so on. > > Thanks suckless community and its developers for their wonderful > software (I use dwm, st, dmenu, tabbed, slock) and inspiration resources > for non-bloated sane software! > > -- > Sergey Matveev (http://www.stargrave.org/) > OpenPGP: 12AD 3268 9C66 0D42 6967 FD75 CB82 0563 2107 AD8A >
