Hi Hiltjo,
> you'd have to keep both the MIT license with the original copyright
> information.
I believe this part is true because almost all MIT style licenses (with
some exception such as `MIT-0`) have the following restriction:
The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included
in
all copies or substantial portions of the Software.
> I think you can relicense only your own changes to GPL [...]
>
> And probably explain very clearly to which new parts the GPL license applies.
However, I don't believe these are true. Because there's nothing in the
MIT license that requires tracking which part is new nor is there
anything preventing derivative work under a different license.
So my understanding is more or less the same as what Markus Wichmann
said on the other reply.
- NRK
