(replying to Laslo) > which is basically a CGI-interface and thus not within quark's scope.
thttpd has a patch that adds basic CGI support, and I've quickly scanned the patch, and it seems super simple.. perhaps you could use that in one way or another. I don't mean to say "support intellectual property" (I despise it), but just to warn you - I'm not sure what the license they use is. Git? What a bloated mess.. I ahve been working on an Suckless thing alike it, but my health :( No, yeah, I absolutely understand.. but I think Quark can be good, if we just fix this shitty problem lol.. like.. I got lots of hope in it, by which I mean you guys ._. sorry. I just want Suckless software to succeed.. and last time I checked OpenBSD's httpd code - it was NOT nearly as suckless lul. Best regards - anon
