Ok. But this is a behavioral change right? How can a patch help in this case?
Admins always protest the decision in almost every community if it isn't theirs. Am I suggesting something harmful here? It takes a minute to sign a release and this improves security. It makes sure that user gets the same piece of code that the dev made. If that action helps suckless, why be reluctant because I initiated that mail? Thanking you Sagar Acharya https://designman.org 17 Apr 2021, 02:39 by hil...@codemadness.org: > On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 09:16:30PM +0200, Anders Damsgaard wrote: > >> * Sagar Acharya <sagaracha...@tutanota.com> [2021-04-16 20:01:56 +0200]: >> >> > Was any decision taken with regards to this? Would we have certain >> > checksums and sigs for releases in future? >> > >> > Thanking you >> > Sagar Acharya >> > https://designman.org >> >> Sagar, please realize that people are volunteering their time, and I think >> most are doing it for fun. As far as I can tell, you are not entitled to >> demand any action. If you want something done, send a patch and expect >> it to be carefully scrutinized. >> > > I agree with this and for now it won't be changed. > > The admins team will make a decision about this if needed. > > -- > Kind regards, > Hiltjo >
