Thanks very much for you comprehensive and thorough reply. I'll be studying it over the course of many days. I disagree with your first point though, so read on.
On Fri, Dec 18, 2020, at 05:08, Sergey Matveev wrote: > Just a remark: when using "basic" features of redo, just what DJB > described, there is no difference between various redo implementations. > I used apenwarr/redo, apenwarr/do, redo-c and goredo with the same > project, with the same .do-files without any modifications and behaviour > differences. According to its README, redo-c does *not* capture standard output by default. So I would think you would have to use it differently, either by using the -s option or setting the environment variable REDO_STDOUT. Or maybe all your .do files write to $3 rather than stdout?
