On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 5:17 AM Michael Forney <mfor...@mforney.org> wrote: > > All the other implementations I looked at *do* insert the contents of the > file.
I think that's the important point. We should also check how other commands that "start the next cycle" behave in relation to r. E.g. I could see the same problem with c and D (c, d, and D functions end with a call to new_next() in the current sbase sed). Luckily it looks like a pretty simple fix of adding a call to do_writes() before calling new_next() (but I didn't dig deep enough to see if there are any unintended consequences there). Perhaps we should bring this up on the austin group list and get them to clarify the text.
