This was a question about the preprocessor, please take your sh (off-)topic to a different thread.
That main, mostly the switch part, is huge! Having more than 3 levels of nesting of loops+conditionals (if, for, while, switch) is a code smell; it is hard to read, hard to reason about and easy to get wrong. Bonus points for not using lex/yacc etc, writing a parser by hand needn't be hard. Still, some refactoring to create smaller, readable and maintainable functions would go a long way. Maybe trying out to write out the states the parser can be in as a table would help to see if the parser can be simplified or the token choices changed. Toying with an FSM implementation might be fun too :) Why are you building this tool? Fun, education, prototype? What is the end goal? Who is the audience? Good luck with your project! -- Peter Nagy - To reach a goal one has to enjoy the journey On April 23, 2019 7:44:57 PM UTC, Evan Gates <evan.ga...@gmail.com> wrote: >On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 12:42 PM Hadrien Lacour ><hadrien.lac...@posteo.net> wrote: >> That was just shitposting. I use `find` to avoid most of the UNIX >braindamage >> in this case. > >Which is good as long as you use -exec correctly. Or if you're going >to use xargs make sure to use nul separated lists. Xargs without the >nul option is broken by design.
