On Mon, Apr 01, 2019 at 07:34:20PM +0200, Markus Wichmann wrote: > you aren't exactly a beacon of sunshine either. You like to make > normative claims all over the place, but when asked to defend them, you > only have names to call people. Maybe C++ is genuinely as horrible as > you say. I have seen evidence of that. But most of it boils down to "if > you use it wrong, it turns into spagghetti code in a pretty dress". > Well, C's the same way, sans pretty dress.
Don't worry, you aren't such a beacon neither... like if anybody could be here. Simple C or "reduced/fixed syntax" C is the _less worse_ technical _compromise_ above machine code, for now. Let me recall you something: there is no thing as good code, only code that "suckless"... > That first sentence of David's answer is merely the logical conclusion > of thinking your restrictions to the end. In suckless context, this is near an insult. I don't need to loose too much of my time with such human being, and I won't. Let them code amazing-ly abstracted c++52 or python12 or viper7 code... but if it could be on msdn where it's more appropriate... -- Sylvain
