On Fri, 19 Oct 2018 at 07:04, David Demelier <mark...@malikania.fr> wrote: > Le 23/09/2018 à 06:10, AR Garbe a écrit : > > Back in the days I also concluded that the introduction of Xinerama > > and multihead support was a bad idea after all. > > > > I'm really at a point to consider forking dwm and dmenu to simply rely > > on X11 as it used to be, perhaps with going the extra mile to remove > > Xinerama support as well and to rely on single headed setups. > > Are you saying that you would like to remove the support for multiple > screens?
No. However I've come up with a smaller dwm.c that excludes most of the Screen abstraction and allows to be compiled without XINERAMA support enabled and a xinerama.c that introduces the Screen primitives and contains the sendmon() et. al. functions. It's still not final yet, but I'm considering this as right move. > If yes, please don't minimize the number of multiheads setups, both at > work and at home I have two monitors. Or as Quentin said at least in a > separate patch. No worries, xinerama will be supported, but I wanted to have a leaner core dwm without xinerama. Best regards, Anselm
