> On Thu, 19 Oct 2017 17:36:15 +0200 > Quentin Rameau <quinq@fifth.space> wrote: > > Hey Quentin, > > > There's enough pollution on the list. > > that's true, but it was a genuine question both Kamil and I had, and > it served the question. If GNOME for some reason had an internal > ref-counter for objects allocated with g_strdup(), we might have > looked at the patch a bit differently. But, as expected, it's just > more bloat from the GNU-crowd. > It is important to factor out harmful concepts like these. Everyone > who read the thread will now think twice about using a GNOME function > when he's confronted with it.
Please stop trying to justify yourself by stating the obvious, enough already.
