On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 10:29:41AM +0000, sylvain.bertr...@gmail.com wrote: > I would go #define and not direct "static const". > > Because I think "const" is part of the excess syntax of C and should be > optional (and treated as an optional variable attribute).
You really don't think we should enforce preventing people from doing stupid things? Might not matter *as much* without concurrency, and it's only compile-time rather than run-time meaningful for non-stack variables due to most processors' memory model. But it's unfortunately still useful to prevent people from doing stupid things. I just wouldn't expect people to const everything that can or should be.
