You forgot to shit about vulkan in your rampage. (/s) Maybe you could be helpful and provide an idea for the problem Kamil is asking, instead of ranting about not using C.
I still remember the words of arg, FRIGN & co after slcon4 stating that they'll start moderating the community. All I've seen about Sylvain in the last 6 months is nothing more than useless rant about C++. On 09/22/17 20:51, sylvain.bertr...@gmail.com wrote: > > This topic was discussed earlier: no, go is not worth it. It's really a bad > compromise against simple and explicit C. Wrong again: simple and explicit C > is > enough for high-level-applications, even for the web (noscript of course). > Don't recall if go has mandatory/default garbage collecting runtime. > > It's a worthless dependency of a high technical cost. > > It has nothing to do on suckless. > > ---- > > But for _not suckless_ project, I would prefer a javascript interpreter coded > with rust, which is much much more adapted to answer the issues raised by the > thread starting questions (better security). > Additionaly, I was told, personally did not check, that the generic algorithms > from the c++ boost library applied to the later string classes and templates > are so much well balanced than go string handling (and rust handling too), > really do check this. > But what seems trendy, is to write code generators in python2 (not 3 since > it's > less good than its previous version) and perl5 (important to have both) which > fit closely the client requirements. > Or the ultimate, just above the previous "super adequate" code generators for > all the reasons of the world : you write a llvm front-end for an homebrew > language 100% designed for the client requirements. > > ---- > > What is amazing, is that the mailing list is still the target of people 100% > missing the point of suckless. > > It does look too much like a troll, won't add more. >
