On Thu, Sep 07, 2017 at 10:21:52PM +0200, Jan Klemkow wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this path applies action command support to ii. It was developed at the
> slcon4, but I was to lazy. So, I sent it now.
>
> Any comments or questions?
>
> Bye,
> Jan
>
> From 1ddd9265ff3601cc07181d3fc79d33296c77adaf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Jan Klemkow <j.klem...@wemelug.de>
> Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2017 22:00:29 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] add support for irc action command
>
> ---
> ii.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/ii.c b/ii.c
> index 6583792..e2db622 100644
> --- a/ii.c
> +++ b/ii.c
> @@ -505,6 +505,17 @@ proc_channels_input(int ircfd, Channel *c, char *buf)
> snprintf(msg, sizeof(msg), "NICK %s\r\n",
> &buf[3]);
> }
> break;
> + case 'm': /* action */
> + if (buflen >= 3) {
> + snprintf(msg, sizeof(msg), "*%s %s", nick,
> &buf[3]);
Minor nitpick, I'd prefer a space after the wildcard:
> + snprintf(msg, sizeof(msg), "* %s %s", nick,
> &buf[3]);
> + channel_print(c, msg);
> + snprintf(msg, sizeof(msg),
> + "PRIVMSG %s :\01ACTION %s\01\r\n",
> + c->name, &buf[3]);
> + ewritestr(ircfd, msg);
> + return;
> + }
> + break;
> case 'l': /* leave */
> if (c == channelmaster)
> return;
> @@ -545,6 +556,7 @@ proc_server_cmd(int fd, char *buf)
> Channel *c;
> const char *channel;
> char *argv[TOK_LAST], *cmd = NULL, *p = NULL;
> + char text[IRC_MSG_MAX] = { '\0', '\0' };
> unsigned int i;
>
> if (!buf || buf[0] == '\0')
> @@ -641,8 +653,12 @@ proc_server_cmd(int fd, char *buf)
> snprintf(msg, sizeof(msg), "-!- \"%s\")",
> argv[TOK_TEXT] ? argv[TOK_TEXT] : "");
> } else if (!strcmp("PRIVMSG", argv[TOK_CMD])) {
> - snprintf(msg, sizeof(msg), "<%s> %s", argv[TOK_NICKSRV],
> - argv[TOK_TEXT] ? argv[TOK_TEXT] : "");
> + if (sscanf(argv[TOK_TEXT], "\01ACTION%[^\01]\01", text) == 1)
> + snprintf(msg, sizeof(msg), "*%s %s", argv[TOK_NICKSRV],
> + *text ? &text[1] : "");
You should use a regular check here (strncmp?) without the extra text buffer.
> + else
> + snprintf(msg, sizeof(msg), "<%s> %s", argv[TOK_NICKSRV],
> + argv[TOK_TEXT] ? argv[TOK_TEXT] : "");
> } else {
> return; /* can't read this message */
> }
Is this meant for upstream ii?
With the changes I think its reasonable to include this in the upstream version.
Any thoughts or is it bloat?
--
Kind regards,
Hiltjo
