silvan is correct, urxvtd crashed once and wasted my time. once is already too much to warrant the minuscule benefit. urxvt still uses less memory than st, putting any effort to minimize it further is a waste of time.
- [dev] [st] Larger HISTSIZE consumes huge memory Techno Implant
- Re: [dev] [st] Larger HISTSIZE consumes huge memor... Kamil CholewiĆski
- Re: [dev] [st] Larger HISTSIZE consumes huge m... Quentin Rameau
- Re: [dev] [st] Larger HISTSIZE consumes hu... hiro
- Re: [dev] [st] Larger HISTSIZE consume... Techno Implant
- Re: [dev] [st] Larger HISTSIZE co... Ivan Tham
- Re: [dev] [st] Larger HISTSIZ... Silvan Jegen
- Re: [dev] [st] Larger HISTSIZE consumes huge memor... Jochen Sprickerhof
- Re: [dev] [st] Larger HISTSIZE consumes huge m... hiro
- Re: [dev] [st] Larger HISTSIZE consumes huge m... Techno Implant
- Re: [dev] [st] Larger HISTSIZE consumes hu... Jochen Sprickerhof
- Re: [dev] [st] Larger HISTSIZE consume... Techno Implant
- Re: [dev] [st] Larger HISTSIZE consume... Techno Implant
- Re: [dev] [st] Larger HISTSIZE co... Jordi Marine
- Re: [dev] [st] Larger HISTSIZE consumes huge memor... Eric Pruitt