> However not without labor on the part of the developer. check the script i posted on this mailing list before that doesn't require any labor on part of the developer since i posted it.
On 6/13/17, Kamil Cholewiński <harry6...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, 13 Jun 2017, sylvain.bertr...@gmail.com wrote: >> When mentioning souldcloud, I usually refer to the "sound editing" >> feature. > > As a person that does most of his music making in plain old analog > (including a tape recorder), I miss the point of having a web service > doing audio stuff, i.e. what can SC do in the browser that I couldn't do > with a desktop app? > >> For youtube, we agree 100%, but it seems that the javascript/modern web >> engine >> combo is used as a kind of DRM... namely the dependency by complexity is >> _on >> purpose_ (see the user agreement of youtube: you MUST use the >> javascript/modern >> web engine video player. [...] > > In principle, in practice youtube-dl[1] still works pretty well ;) > However not without labor on the part of the developer. > I suspect there will be a way, as long as YT allows watching videos > without logging in - which would get a lot of people upset. > > [1]: https://rg3.github.io/youtube-dl/ > >
