On 2/2/17, willy <wi...@mailoo.org> wrote: > At this point, I'm not sure where to look at, or even if the bug > really lies in tar and not in bzip2. > I checked the size (both octal and converted) and the value is good. So > I'm not sure why the headers are not well read. > In the case of the archive above, the error occurs on the last entry, > but depending on the archives, it can occur on the second entry or in > the middle, there's no rule. > > I hope my example are clear to define what the issue is. Would anyone > have an idea?
It's a tar bug. See http://lists.suckless.org/dev/1612/30865.html.
