On Sat, 24 Sep 2016 21:25:32 +0100 Joseph Graham <jos...@xylon.me.uk> wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 08:54:39PM +0200, ilf wrote: > > I wonder why the suckless-websites are only available in HTTP, not > > in HTTPS. In the age of letsencrypt.org, there aren't a lot of > > valid excuses against TLS. Am I missing one from a > > suckless-philosopy? Or has this just never been requested? > > > > I for one would love to see unencrypted communications on the > > internet die. > > > > Greetings to slcon! > > > > (Pardon if it's been discussed, I did not find it in the archives.) > > > > -- > > ilf > > > > Über 80 Millionen Deutsche benutzen keine Konsole. Klick dich nicht > > weg! -- Eine Initiative des Bundesamtes für Tastaturbenutzung > > HTTPS is unecessary and bloated. It creates loads of latency on > connection, it stops proxies caching requests between clients. All > just for some false sense of security. > > -Joseph > > Whatever: https://sslmate.com/ Nick -- "Gosh that takes me back... or is it forward? That's the trouble with time travel, you never can tell." -- Doctor Who "Androids of Tara"
