On 21 September 2016 at 16:45, Evan Gates <evan.ga...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 11:02 PM, FRIGN <d...@frign.de> wrote: >> Of course, given there is only one implementation, it is highly >> portable per-se, given the interpretation is equal everywhere and 9base >> is quite easily portable. > > Sadly there are two implementations. This rc[0] claims to be a > reimplementation for unix systems, but contains incompatible changes. > Here is the list of problems from the man page:
There are two, but only the original one can be considered. Byron's rc was supposed to work in a regular unix environment with GNU userland. But especially its environment handling is completely different to the original rc, which allows exporting fn's. -Anselm
