On Tue, 13 Sep 2016 18:14:25 +0100, Cág wrote: >[0]: http://repo.or.cz/fbpdf.git
Thanks, it seems acceptable. Even if it'd be better if mupdf could do djvu (but I'm daydreaming here). On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 10:46:58PM +0300, ilab...@gmail.com wrote: > Why would you want to do this? It makes some sense to save new scans to > DjVu because the format is simplier, but converting one lossy format to > another lossy format is not a good idea. > Well, because of the massive compression improvements, and because I prefer free stuff.
