On 11 August 2016 at 10:10, FRIGN <d...@frign.de> wrote: > On Thu, 11 Aug 2016 09:44:45 +0200 > Anselm R Garbe <garb...@gmail.com> wrote: >> The stali plan has changed for me a bit during the last year. A couple >> of months ago I tried to get stali self-bootstrappable based on just >> src/. I have now given up on this idea for various reasons: >> [...] >> Any help is welcome under the new premises above. I think it is kind >> of a hygene factor to not aim for a self-bootstrappable environment. >> The beauty is that target platform, not the src/. The src/ is hideous >> in most parts anyways, if you consider what stali relies on. > > I've been wondering for a while what you think the problem is with > OpenBSD. Wouldn't it make more sense to somehow start an initative in > OpenBSD to promote static linking there?
I have no problem with OpenBSD per se, but I do think that its scope is general (server) purpose and that the hardware support in the embedded non-network space doesn't sound too great to me. linux kernel + some dedicated userland is far more flexible imho. Cheers, Anselm
