On Tue, 12 Jul 2016 16:19:40 -0800 Britton Kerin <[email protected]> wrote:
Hey Britton, > To me the availability of patches in the current format implies that > they are curated and cared for, and I don't trust automated systems > like this to work right. I'd rather just see a patch again an old > version. okay, maybe there's a misunderstanding. The automation only applies to the git-patches. For tagged versions, we just create a patch and be done with it. The situation definitely is a mess for dwm. > I liked having -git_ in there. (I see later you decided to omit). > Maybe all suckless users are git versed but I doubt it. > Seems like an example of expecting others to see the world like > you do. The patch names are already verbose, why not > make things explicit? I agree with you, but it has been decided like that and I made the mistake to agree to the non-git version here on the ml. Cheers FRIGN -- FRIGN <[email protected]>
