On Wed, 15 Jun 2016, David Phillips <dbphillip...@gmail.com> wrote: > Some people thought it was a good idea to use 6.1 to denote git head before > 6.1 actually came out. This worked fine until they stopped maintaining > their patches to apply against git head. > > Something should be done about the patches that no longer apply cleanly, > however.
Keep the "supported" patches as commits on separate branches in the official git repo? - Pretty obvious which commit is the patch derived from, +1 - Quite easy to rebase a patch to latest master, +1 - Are git branches considered suckless though? :) K.
